22 Jul 2014 • Technology, .Net, IIS Express
While testing some code this morning I was having some issues with an exception that was claiming something the code said was impossible. Given this I had to assume that the code in question was not being executed against the database I expected. A quick look at SQL Profiler confirmed this to be the case, however the configuration appeared to be correct.
The executing code was being run in IIS Express, started from Visual Studio, and was a recent branch of our main codebase. The only explanation left to me was the ISS Express was running the wrong binaries and the wrong config. It was indeed so.
IIS Express stores configuration files in:
%USERPROFILE%\Documents\IISExpress\config
A quick look here (applicationhost.config) showed that I was indeed running binaries from the wrong branch. It seems that there isn’t a check at startup that ensures that IIS Express is configured to resolve a given port to the location of the binaries as VS understands it to be.
The simple solution is to ensure that, when you branch, you update the port number for IIS Express to a unique value.
Well done Germany. The best team won. Been great in this tournament. Desire, strength, skill, patience. All about the team.
02 Jul 2014 • Recipes
I love brownies, fairly quick and incredibly tasty. Here’s my prefered recipe, shamelessly stolen from a colleague.
Ingredients
- 4oz Butter
- 1.5oz Cocoa
- 2 Eggs
- 8oz Castor Sugar (usually reduce this slightly)
- 2oz Self-raising Flour
- 1pk Choc Chips
Steps
- Melt butter, add cocoa
- In separate bowl beat eggs with sugar for long time until thick
- Add cocoa/butter mix to sugar and eggs
- Add flour and choc chips
- Cook @ 160C for 1/2 hour
This should make about enough for an 8- or 9-inch baking tin.
Simples takes about an hour from start to finish and taste awesome, probably best not to eat too many though.
26 Jun 2014 • Technology
I ran across a problem the other day the reason for which took me somewhat by suprise. A class in the codebase I work on has the responsibility for validating incoming XML messages against a schema. We noticed that a bad message was failing after the schema check, and it wasn’t just a slightly incorrect message, it was a totally incorrect message intended for another part of the system.
Using the awesome Linqpad I pulled together a trivial example to investigate.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="schemas.deabill.net"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:element name="MyRootElement" type="xs:string" />
</xs:schema>
My schema expected a single MyRootElement node (of type string) in the schemas.deabill.net namespace. The validation code looked much like this:
var schemaSet = new XmlSchemaSet();
schemaSet.Add(XmlSchema.Read(new StringReader(MySchema), (sender, args) => Console.WriteLine(args.Message)));
var settings = new XmlReaderSettings
{
ValidationType = ValidationType.Schema,
Schemas = schemaSet
};
settings.ValidationEventHandler += (sender, args) => Console.WriteLine(args.Message);
var reader = XmlReader.Create(new StringReader(MyXml), settings);
while (reader.Read()) {}
I’ve simplified and tweaked a few things but the important function is as-was. Then I validated the following XML…
Despite being the wrong element name and having no namespace at all the validation succeeded. I decided to see how the validator responded is the element was at least in the correct namespace…
<IncorrectRootElement xmlns="schemas.deabill.net" />
The ‘schemas.deabill.net:IncorrectRootElement’ element is not declared.
This was more like what I was expecting. A validation failure highlighting the undefined element. Some further digging revealed that the schema validating XML reader in .NET does not consider the bad namespace an error, merely a warning. The upshot being that slightly incorrect messages would fail validation, but totally incorrect messages would fall through.
Personally, I think an unexpected element in an unexpected namespace is very much an error. The default behaviour I’d expect would be to reject anything not in a given schema namespace, but who am I to argue? A quick tweak to the XMLReaderSettings solves the problem.
ValidationFlags = XmlSchemaValidationFlags.ReportValidationWarnings
Now my spurious XML fails validation as expected.
Could not find schema information for the element ‘IncorrectRootElement’.
You do need to be a bit careful raising validation warnings as it may lead to other (unforeseen) failures, but it’s a small gotcha that got me.
ITV should probably be barred from covering football. It’s embarrassing how bad they are. You almost feel sorry for them.